
My name is David Robins: Christian, lead developer (resume), writer, photographer, runner, libertarian (voluntaryist), and student.
This is also my son David Geoffrey Robins' site.
Education: Barak wants money for teachers (rather than letting the market sort it out; the government has no business in education), and for kids (what, the tax deductions aren't enough? I favor a "pay for your own damn spawn", and feel free to replace "spawn" with "everything": it's the libertarian way). He also wants to hand out more "free" money for college students (work and get loans; I did).
Immigration: He has some good points, he really does—everyone wants secure borders, for example (although he's probably delayed and voted against actual work here), but they're really just sugar for his main wish, eerily titled "Bring People Out of the Shadows". The word you are looking for, Barack you traitor, is amnesty. They're not in "shadows" any more than a bank robber is in the "shadows" after he's left the bank with the loot; they're fugitives from the law, and should be launched over our border with a trebuchet after being chipped to ensure they never return. The fourteenth amendment should be clarified so its intent is clear: children of illegals and foreign nationals should not get U.S. citizenship; employee verification should be mandatory everywhere; and illegals should not get any social benefits whatsoever. That's comprehensive immigration reform: enforce the law.
20080618: Did some pruning outside; grass is still short, can wait until the weekend to cut again as long as the rain holds off. Uploaded resume to PMP application: all thatÂs remaining is one of my recommendations, my personal statement, printing the application (it's listed as a step—I guess they want you to have a backup, since it is an online application), and paying; it's all due by July 1.IÂm not against all taxation. I recognize that you donÂt get something for nothing. The protection of my rights as a citizen, and our national sovereignty, is worth a lot to me. And IÂm willing to pay for that. But IÂm not willing to pay for everything else anybody wants that they canÂt afford to pay for themselves. If you want something of value, you have to provide value in return. Just because you canÂt afford something, doesnÂt give you the right to take it out of my pocket. Nobody owes you anything, except what you earn.Well said, Peggi. Obamunisti non carborundum. I don't think I've ever met anyone whose views align so well with mine.
Economy: Let me quote from Obama's page: "I believe that America's free market has been the engine of America's great progress. … We are all in this together… we all have a stake in each other's success because the more Americans prosper, the more America prospers." And there's the socialist coming out: reading between the lines, he's justifying the type of taking that take not from the rich, but from the working, and give to the indolent, to the illegal alien, to the couple that has children they cannot afford, all of whom who expect the government, that is, people that work to subsidize them. Whenever a politician says "we", keep a good grip on your wallet. Let's enumerate how he plans to rob from the useful and give to the useless, shall we?| Category | Costs | Who Pays | Who Benefits |
| Economy | |||
| Tax cut for working families | Pure pandering. Taxes are a percentage; that percentage even increases the more one makes, which people have the gall to call progressive (it may be a technical term, but it's certainly a loaded one). Where are these $500 and $1000 gifts to "middle-class Americans" going to come from? That's right, other "middle-class Americans"—the ones that are working just a bit harder. (Also, why for "families" and not singles? Does he count childless couples as "families"?) | "Middle-class Americans" that work and/or provide jobs (capitalists). | "Middle-class Americans" that don't work (dedicated communists, or "Obamunists"). |
| Simplify tax filings | This is is something I believe I can support, if it doesn't cost an inordinate amount. I personally don't find it all that complicated: we always file paper taxes and it takes us about half an hour with a calculator each year to put everything together; presumably filing online is even easier. Barack wants to make tax filing easier for |
Everybody. Accountants? People that like their privacy? | Everybody, I hope. |
| Fight for fair trade | Sounds good: even protectionism is a good thing for Americans if it keeps jobs and enriches the nation; screw the global economy, support your country. So far so good; although I doubt the WTO will be as cooperative as he thinks and we'd probably do better to get out from under than unelected body. I'm also behind amending NAFTA to be more in our favor; the U.S. should not maintain agreements that are not in our interest (and canceling or amending isn't reneging; we are not refusing to stand by the terms of the agreement, just offering to either renegotiate in good faith, or to let everyone walk away). | Sellouts to China, India, the European Union, etc. | Everyone else (patriots?) |
| Transition assistance | Weaselly, though—it looks like more free (or tax-free) money. I support education, I support retraining, but I don't think I should have to pay for someone else's education or training. | Taxpayers. | Freeloaders. |
| Support job creation | More wolves and sheep luncheons: the government has never been efficient at creating jobs; it just sucks more money from the tax-paying. Private industry has always been much better at creating jobs and directing research. | Taxpayers. | Freeloaders. |
| Invest in U.S. manufacturing, create "green" jobs | The first is fine; but let the market decide if it wants it or not, and how best to make it happen. | Taxpayers. | US industry, environmentalists. |
| Next-generation broadband | Extremely high, if taxpayers are forced to pay to get broadband Internet to areas which aren't profitable for existing companies. | Taxpayers; non-users. | Very rural areas. |
| "Open Internet" (network neutrality) | Somewhat sound in principle, but I also think it's fair that if a company pays for infrastructure, it should get to control it. However, since usually companies that lay network infrastructure are highly subsidized (in costs and in use of public land), I think a feasible compromise would be to let a company be able to control these subsidized networks for a limited non-renewable period (one to five years, depending on the network), and then it reverts to common carrier status. | Customers of and companies that build infrastructure. | Internet users. |
| Support unions, protect strikers | There's too little support for employees to choose not to unionize; will his proposals force unionization on workers that don't want it? Our freedom to associate already implies unions, since a union is just an association of like-minded people, exercising their rights. No government intervention is needed, unless other laws (assault, intimidation) are being broken. | Taxpayers. | Lazy workers. |
| Raise minimum wage. | Sure, raise it to $100/hour. That'll help everyone! Wait, it won't? Price caps (floors) aren't magic? You don't say. He also wants to "increase the Earned Income Tax Credit to make sure that full-time workers earn a living wage that allows them to raise their families and pay for basic needs": why should I pay for someone else's bad decision to have kids they can't afford? | Workers: companies may want to hire someone at $5/hour, but not at $10/hour, so they just get by with fewer employees. | Research, perhaps—technology will evolve to eliminate even more labor-intensive jobs. Unemployment service workers. |
| Universal mortgage credit | Restructuring of tax law will fall on everyone (presumably renters will be hit hardest since they won't get the credit). If you have a mortgage, itemize, you lazy idiots. | Renters. | Poorer homeowners. |
| Home loan bills | I agree with some of the fraud prevention ideas in principle, but what constitutes fraud? If someone signs a contract without reading and understanding it, the fault is theirs, not the mortgage broker's. As it is their fault, nobody should be helping them avoid foreclosure: it is their just desserts. | Responsible owners/renters. | Irresponsible homeowners. |
| Credit card bill of rights | Mostly a bad idea. Currently, credit card companies must disclose changes to the agreement and cardholders can cancel their card if they want to; nobody forces them to keep it. Applying interest rate increases only to future debt makes credit card companies pay the difference; that and any rate ceilings will make it impossible for lower-income people or those with lower credit scores to get credit; the risk to the companies is higher than the return. | Not the credit card companies, that's for sure. People with poor credit, taxpayers. | Government bureaucracy. |
| Cap payday loan interest | See credit card caps, above. | ||
| Reform bankruptcy laws for medical crises | Are you kidding? If I as a taxpayer have to end up footing the bill for someone's medical procedure, damn skippy they'd better end up bankrupt and have to pay back whatever they got. | Taxpayers. | The indolent and those that don't plan ahead; a very few true hard-luck cases. |
| Expand the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) | He wants to bring coverage to businesses with 25+ employees, instead of the current 50+. Either those businesses will have to fire a lot of people, or go under due to their new costs. | Small businesses; taxpayers; people that want to work. | Nobody, really; maybe a few baby factories. |
| More child freebies | More of my taxes to people with kids, discriminatory flex-time for parents, more "free" after-school programs. Repeat after me: if you can't afford to have children without government help, you cannot afford children: DO NOT HAVE THEM and we'll all be happier. | Me, and others like me without children; responsible parents. | Irresponsible parents. |
20080611, 12: Had some yard maintenance done by Scott's Landscape Service: pruning, weeding, trimming, and replacing some of the outdoor lights that got topped when the tree fell (or by the construction workers).
Continuing on with a freedom-and-cost-based analysis of B. Hussein's issues, since I couldn't find one, and needed to set out clearly why Obama is bad for (working) America.| Category | Costs | Who Pays | Who Benefits |
| Civil Rights | |||
| Hate crimes | Justice: crimes against so-called minorities will get harsher punishment than the same crime against a non-minority; freedom of speech: people will fear to express their opinions (e.g. against homosexuality) because those opinions are now "hate crimes". | Anyone with anti-establishment or anti-popular views (this would legitimize juror bias). Hate crime laws are bogus: they give license for witch-hunts against thoughtcrime, no matter who controls the government. It is the act, not the thought, that should be punished. | Minorities; liberals; dictators. |
| End deceptive voting practice | Probably code to spend federal money to print voting pamphlets in more languages (learn English!) | English-speaking taxpayers. | Illegal voters and anchor babies, or legal immigrants that refuse to learn English (and this would be a disincentive). |
| End racial profiling | Security. Over-sensitive political correctness will stop police and airport security from doing their work. A dilapidated car cruising an expensive neighborhood driven by someone out of the demographic probably is up to no good, but now stopping them to ask a few questions will no longer be allowed. I'll trust that police who have been patrolling a neighborhood for decades have good instincts about who shouldn't be there, and not tie their hands. Furthermore, it's not white grandmothers that are trying to blow up airplanes; it's middle-aged Arab men, and profiling saves lives. | Travellers, law-abiding citizens. | Terrorists. |
| Reduce drug sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. | Security. I have it on good authority that crack is a worse drug: so why shouldn't worse be punished more? | Law-abiding citizens. | Illegal drug users. If minorities are the ones using crack cocaine, as Barack alleges, wouldn't the better solution be for them to stop using it? |
| Expand drug courts | More drug offenders on the streets. The heading sounds good, but he actually means that he wants to keep drug offenders out of jail and on the streets. Oh boy, can we? | " | Illegal drug users. |
| Affirmative action | Businesses will have to hire minorities over qualified applicants; this is simple racism/sexism. Didn't someone famous once wish that "[his] children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"? | Businesses, qualified applicants. | Minorities. |
| Disabilities | |||
| Provide Americans with disabilities with the educational opportunities they need to succeed. | Probably weasel words meaning he wants other people to pay for said education. I'm not against giving some help to those that truly need it, but the help should be (a) voluntary, which means that (b) I (or an organization that I trust and give money to) can judge need, not some government bureaucrat with too many applications and too little time. |
Taxpayers. | Disabled people—and anyone who can trick the government, which isn't known for its discernment. |
| Support independent, community-based living for Americans with disabilities. | Although he doesn't say it explicitly, I'd imagine what he means is to pay for this "community living" using my taxes. It's expensive enough to pay for my own housing, let alone everyone else's. | " | " |
| Increase the employment rate of workers with disabilities. | Unless he just means to go and encourage them to apply for jobs rather than relying on government handouts (which would be great), it hints of affirmative action, for which see above, substituting disability for race. | Qualified workers, businesses. | Unqualified workers. |
20080529: Emailed question re: cans at SVRC; the rules appear to conflict: "no cans" vs. directions how to set up cans as targets. The info@ guy forwarded to the club president; no answer yet. It's possible cans are allowed on the rifle range but not the pistol range, since the prohibition appears in the pistol range rules.
My HDMI-DVI adapter arrived. Honey had Chelsea from school over, we got pizza for dinner. When we got back from dropping off Chelsea, I connected the Myth box to the TV via the HDMI cable and DVI-HDMI adapter (together they were under $10 from Amazon). I had to tweak my xorg.conf file a bit (searched the web, this thread was helpful, mainly the bit about not treating it as a TV; I changed the Monitor HorizSync/VertRefresh to their values, set Screen DefaultDepth to 24, Screen/Display Depth to 24, and commented out the Screen "ConnectedMonitor" and "TVOverscan" options as well as Screen/Display's Modes: defaults work fine). Wow, HD is pretty! I had a test HD episode of Grey's Anatomy saved, and it looks wow.
It seems that socialism only differs from Marxism in that Marxism requires a revolution and its rhetoric is a bit more insane; so although some call B. Hussein Obama a Marxist, we really have to withhold judgment until the revolution.